slaveofone’s archive for July, 2008

Shake The Dust From Your Feet – P1 by slaveofone

In the Synoptic Gospels, there is a puzzling series of commands given by Yeshua to those disciples he is sending out to proclaim the good news.

Acquire no gold nor silver nor copper for your belts, no bag for your journey, nor two tunics, nor sandals, nor a staff . . . And if anyone will not receive you or listen to your words, shake off the dust from your feet when you leave.

Matthew 10:9-10, 14

He charged them to take nothing for their journey except a staff—no bread, no bag, no money in their belts—but to wear sandals and not put on two tunics. . . . And if any place will not receive you and they will not listen to you, when you leave, shake off the dust that is on your feet.

Mark 6:8-9, 11

And he said to them, Take nothing for your journey, no staff, nor bag, nor bread, nor money; and do not have two tunics. . . . And wherever they do not receive you, when you leave that town, shake off the dust from your feet.

Luke 9:3, 5

Many words have been spilled explicating the reasons, intentions, or purpose of these commands. And not a few have devoted themselves to untangling the confusing and seemingly contradictory nature of what is or isn’t allowed.[1] What virtually every discussion lacks, however, is a comparison of Yeshua’s ordinances with the halacha of ancient Jewish tradition and Oral Law.

He may not enter into the Temple Mount with his staff or his sandal or his wallet, or with the dust upon his feet, nor may he make of it a short by-path; still less may he spit there.

Mishnah, Tractate Berakot 9:5

It has been taught . . . a man must not go up to the hill of the Temple neither with shoes, nor with dust on his feet, nor with money wrapped in a cloth, nor with a girdle[2] on. . . . Nor may a man make use of it as a shortcut, and less still may he spit there.

Palestinian Gemara, Tractate Berakot 9:5 (8)

As it has been taught: ’A man should not enter the Temple Mount either with his staff in his hand, or his shoe on his foot, or with his money tied up in his cloth, or with his money bag slung over his shoulder, and he should not make it a short cut, and spitting [there is forbidden].

Babylonian Gemara, Tractate Berakot 62:b

These are authoritative traditions which prohibited or discouraged certain articles and items from being worn or carried as well as certain actions and activities from taking place when going to the Temple. Even more prohibitions were enjoined as one drew further and further toward the Oracle—from the Outer Court to the Inner Court to the Holy and then Holiest Place. There is no doubt that the number and type of regulations one followed depended on one’s specific inclination and religious affiliation. As we’ve already seen in No Sex In The City, the Essenes (perhaps the strictest of them all), would have disallowed intercourse and defecation for those even going into Jerusalem. Even members of the same sect, such as the Pharisees, might disagree on specifics or take on the ideas of a certain faction against the other (perhaps the school of Hillel against the school of Shammai). It may be the case that the Way sect[3] or certain members therein treated many such regulations according to the principle Yeshua taught that if one was cleansed inwardly, then the outside would be clean and that defilement was an inner matter, not on outer one.[4] Thus, for instance, we have the account preserved only in papyrus Oxyrhynchus 840 in which Yeshua takes his disciples on a tour of the Temple and where a chief priest rebukes him and his disciples for being in the Inner Court without having bathed or washed their feet. Yeshua replies:

Art thou then, being here in the temple, clean? He [the chief priest] saith unto him, I am clean; for I washed in the pool of David, and having descended by one staircase I ascended by another, and I put on white and clean garments, and then I came and looked upon these holy vessels. The Saviour answered and said unto him, Woe ye blind, who see not. Thou hast washed in these running waters wherein dogs and swine have been cast night and day, and hast cleansed and wiped the outside skin which also the harlots and flute-girls anoint and wash and wipe and beautify for the lust of men; but within they are full of scorpions and all wickedness. But I and my disciples, who thou sayest have not bathed, have been dipped in the waters of eternal life.

See Shake The Dust From Your Feet – P2.

[1] – For instance, is Yeshua allowing a staff (Mark) or not allowing a staff (Matthew, Luke)? Is he allowing sandals (Mark) or not allowing sandals (Matthew)?
[2] – Most scholars describe this word as a type of outer garment worn over the clothes—perhaps a cloak or tunic.
[3] – By which is meant any Hebrew or Torah-observant follower of Yeshua. See Acts 9:2; 19:9, 23; 22:4; 24:14, 22.
[4] – Matthew 23:25-26 and Mark 7:15. See also Luke 11:37-41 where Yeshua dines without washing. Similarly, Titus 1:15 states that to those who are pure, all things are pure.

No Temple, No Atonement? by slaveofone

Gentile nations benefited from having Israel offer sacrifices and supplication for them in ancient days. It was not uncommon for the priests to intercede daily with the Lord of Hosts even on the behalf of foreign nationals who claimed dominion over them.

Said R. Johanan: Woe be to the nations, they have lost, and they do not know even what they have lost! When the Temple was in existence, the altar atoned for their sins, but now who shall atone for their sins?

Babylonian Gemara, Sukkah 4

The author of Hebrews has an answer:

The former priests, on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death from continuing, but Jesus, on the other hand, because He continues forever [resurrected from the dead], holds His priesthood permanently. Therefore He is able also to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. For it was fitting for us to have such a high priest, holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners and exalted above the heavens; who does not need daily, like those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the sins of the people, because this He did once for all when He offered up Himself. For the Law appoints men as high priests who are weak, but the word of the oath, which came after the Law, appoints a Son, made perfect forever.

Hebrews 7:23-28

The oath that the author of Hebrews speaks of which came after the Law is thus:

YHWH has sworn and will not change his mind, you are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizadek.

Psalm 110:4

The author of Hebrews interprets this to mean that YHWH prepared for a new and better priesthood in place of the Levites and a new and better High Priest in place of Aaron.

For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also.

Hebrews 7:12

Of course, this Hebraic perspective also gels nicely with the concept of a change of covenant (from temporal to eternal). So the nations have lost nothing by the loss of the temple. In fact, they have gained atonement despite it.

The Hebrew Gospel of Matthew by slaveofone

Was the Gospel of Matthew originally written in Hebrew or Aramaic instead of Greek? Some say yes, others no. There are, surprisingly, quite a few fathers of the early church that believed it was. Here is a short selection.

Matthew collected the oracles in the Hebrew language, and each interpreted them as best he could.

Papias (Eusebius, H.E. 3.39.16)

Matthew also issued a written Gospel among the Hebrews in their own dialect while Peter and Paul were preaching at Rome and laying the foundations of the church.

Irenaeus, Adv. Haer. 3.1.1

As having learned by tradition concerning the four Gospels, which alone are unquestionable in the Church of God under heaven, that first was written according to Matthew, who was once a tax collector but afterwards an apostle of Jesus Christ, who published it for those who from Judaism came to believe, composed as it was in the Hebrew language.

Origen (Eusebius, H.E. 6.25.4)

Matthew had first preached to Hebrews, and when he was on the point of going to others he transmitted in writing in his native language the Gospel according to himself, and thus supplied by writing the lack of his own presence to those from whom he was sent.

Eusebius, H.E. 3.24.6

I have not done enough research on the matter to take either position. However, it is nice to know that at least one of those Hebrew texts, the Shem Tov Manuscript, is now available to all and sundry online. There is also a fascinating article discussing the manuscript that I hope to read in the near future: Some Observations on a Recent Edition of and Introduction to Shem-Tob’s Hebrew Matthew by William L. Petersen.

UPDATE: Another Hebrew Matthew Manuscript, the DuTillet, is also available online at the DuTillet Matthew Page.

Litany of Resistance to Violence by slaveofone

Let us pray: For the victims of war
Have mercy
For the maimed and the crippled
Have mercy
For the abandoned and the homeless
Have mercy
For the imprisoned and the tortured
Have mercy
For the widowed and the orphaned
Have mercy
For those fleeing in terror
Have mercy

From the arrogance of power
Deliver us
From the poverty of violence
Deliver us
From the tyranny of greed
Deliver us
From the ugliness of racism
Deliver us
From the hysteria of nationalism
Deliver us
From the seduction of wealth
Deliver us
From the blasphemy and madness of war
Deliver us

With the waging of war
We will not comply
With the forces of fear
We will not comply
With the bombing of civilians
We will not comply
With governments that are blind to the sanctity of life
We will not comply
With economic structures that impoverish and dehumanize
We will not comply
With the help of God’s grace
We will struggle for justice
With the compassion of Christ
We will stand for what is true
In the end there are three things that last
Faith, hope, and love; and the greats of these is love
Thanks be to God

By Jim Loney (CPT Reservist), Toronto, Ontario